"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
11/20/2014 at 13:37 • Filed to: None
0
3|
"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
11/20/2014 at 13:37 • Filed to: None | 0
| 3 |
Today's NPoCP on the front page was a !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! for $37,000. I've found a better deal, because for a measly $143,000 *extra* you can enjoy the same car, only with moar power. It's a !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! with 41,xxx miles. How much more power? I have no clue, I couldn't find any numbers. Speed or acceleration? Who knows? I know nothing about this car other than it's a souped-up G convertible from a known tuner, and that while not as ugly as other Brabii, it's still ugly. I say CP, and I like fast G Wagons. What about y'all?
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Also, any additional info regarding the specs or anything else of this truck are appreciated.
itschrome
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/20/2014 at 13:43 |
|
well the AMG g55 had 349hp so we can assume more than that if brabus is involved
Rock Bottom
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/20/2014 at 13:50 |
|
Am I the only one that doesn't like G-Wagons? They just look top-heavy to me. Also, they're expensive (read: afraid of rocks and trees and nature in general) and they rarely have tires to match their alleged "rugged off-road capability". Also, the type and size of your tires is pretty important... to me, this particular G-Wagon with these car-ish tires is no different than putting mud tires on a Corvette. You could do it, but it's not right.
I guess I'm just more partial to Jeeps and Hum-vees because 'Murica!
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Rock Bottom
11/20/2014 at 13:58 |
|
I've always been a fan of Gs, but I don't care for this one.